The Federalization of Homeschooling
Posted: February 2, 2006
HONDA Continues
Buried deep in the over 700 page document of the
National Defense Authorization Act
for FY 2006, was section 522, labeled Recruiting and Enlistment of Home Schoolers.
In September of 2005, events from July 2003 replayed themselves with Rep. Marilyn
Musgrave of Colorado introducing into the House of Representatives a bill titled
"Home School Non-Discrimination Act," humanizingly given the acronym of
HONDA. This was an omnibus bill that was killed in committee in 2003. [See HONDA]
Posted: December 4, 2003
Opposition to Honda
Additional Information
Did you know?
There are nine pieces of federal legislation currently being considered by Congress
which include the words "home school" in them, or refer to existing legislation that
includes home school.
Those bills are listed below, and if you want more information about them you
can look up the details on Thomas - US Congress on the Internet, at
http://thomas.loc.gov/
-
H.R. 12: To make changes to the Higher Education Act of 1965 incorporating the
results of the FED UP Initiative, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. McKeon, Howard P. (Buck) [CA-25] (introduced 1/7/2003)
Cosponsors: 36
Committees: House Education and the Workforce
Latest Major Action:
1/7/2003 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Makes various technical revisions regarding access to student aid programs. Revises the
HEA general definition of institution of higher education (IHE) to include one that
admits as regular students those who have been home-schooled (as well as high school
graduates or those with equivalency certificates), thus conforming it with provisions
that make such home-schooled students eligible for student aid under HEA title IV.
-
H.R. 282: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit for contributions
for the benefit of elementary and secondary schools. Revises definition of "school"
Sponsor: Rep. Hoekstra, Peter [MI-2] (introduced 1/8/2003)
Cosponsors: 23
Committees: House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 1/8/2003 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
-
H.R. 516: To amend the General Education Provisions Act to clarify the definition of a
student regarding family educational and privacy rights.
Sponsor: Rep. Kennedy, Mark R. [MN-6] (introduced 1/31/2003)
Cosponsors: 14
Committees: House Education and the Workforce
Latest Major Action: 1/31/2003 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Education and the
Workforce.
-
H.R. 612: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals a credit
against income tax for tuition and related expenses for public and nonpublic elementary and secondary
education.
Sponsor: Rep. Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 2/5/2003)
Cosponsors: 8
Committees: House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 2/5/2003 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
-
H.R. 615: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Hope Scholarship
Credit to be used for elementary and secondary expenses.
Sponsor: Rep. Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 2/5/2003)
Cosponsors: 8
Committees: House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 2/5/2003 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
-
H.R. 2732: To amend selected statutes to clarify existing Federal law as to the treatment
of students privately educated at home under State law.
Sponsor: Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [CO-4] (introduced 7/15/2003)
Cosponsors: 79
Committees: House Education and the Workforce; House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 7/28/2003 Referred to House subcommittee.
Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Education Reform.
-
S. 18: A bill to improve early learning opportunities and promote preparedness by increasing
the availability of Head Start programs, to increase the availability and affordability of quality child
care, to reduce child hunger and encourage healthy eating habits, to facilitate parental involvement,
and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [SD] (introduced 1/7/2003)
Cosponsors: 21
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 1/7/2003 Referred to Senate committee.
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
-
S. 1562: A bill to amend selected statutes to clarify existing Federal law as to the treatment of
students privately educated at home under state law.
Sponsor: Sen. Craig, Larry E. [ID] (introduced 8/1/2003)
Cosponsors: 5
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 8/1/2003 Referred to Senate committee.
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
-
S. 1793: A bill to provide for college quality, affordability, and diversity, and for other
purposes.
Sponsor: Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] (introduced 10/28/2003)
Cosponsors: 6
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 10/28/2003 Referred to Senate committee.
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions.
| |
|
What we are witnessing is the federalization of home education!
As more and more federal legislation includes the undefined term
of "home school" we are giving the federal government the right to legislate
what we do and how we do it.
Eventually the term "home school" will have to be defined somewhere - either
by federal statute or by a federal judge. Most of these bills have to do with what
homeschoolers are, or are not, entitled to. This means we are giving the federal
government (Congress) the power to decide that.
Even if the statute will do some positive things for homeschoolers in the short
run - it will surely hurt us in the long run because we are allowing the federal
government to decide to include homeschoolers in various aspects of federal
funding (scholarships, IRS code, etc.). Once this happens, we will of course
have to show accountability on whatever terms the federal government will decide.
This practice must be stopped
Any existing legislation that includes the term "home-school" must be repealed. We
cannot allow the federal government to continue this unconstitutional practice!
You must contact your Congressional representatives and tell them that
homeschoolers cannot be included in federal law - it is unconstitutional, and
since we do not accept federal funding we are exempt from their programs
anyway.
Attorney Deborah Stevenson
Executive Director
National Home Education Legal Defense
www.cthomeschoollaw.com
Judy Aron - Connecticut
In addition - we (in Connecticut) have just met with our statewide
legislative leadership at the capitol. We hope that other states will do
the same, as this is a state's rights issue as well. We have asked that
our statewide legislators talk to our congressional representatives to ask them
not to support this legislation, as well as the reasons why.
Thanks so much!
Judy Aron