Immunization News

[First]  [Previous] |    71     72     73     74     75     76     77     78     79     80    | [Next]  [Last] of 84 page(s)

Vaccination Does Not Improve Outcome of Melanomas Patients

newsfix.ca

by Admin

December 4, 2013

Results of an EORTC study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology show that vaccination with GM2/KLH-QS-21 does not benefit patients with stage II melanoma.

Vaccination with GM2/KLH-QS-21 stimulates the production of antibodies to the GM2 ganglioside, an antigen expressed by many melanomas. Serological response to GM2 was shown to be a positive prognostic factor in patients with melanoma and was the rationale for this trial.

Vaccination for 1 million in US

News From Babylon

by Roland Watson and Charles Bremner

December 3, 2002

A million Americans will be given smallpox vaccinations under the first wave of a mass inoculation order being prepared by President Bush.

The initial stage of the decision would see 500,000 military personnel and 510,000 civilian medical workers receive the jab.<br><br>A second step would involve up to ten million frontline workers such as police, the emergency services, and other healthcare staff who would be the first to respond to a bioterrorism attack.<br><br>Mr Bush is expected to publish the details in the next few days after months of agonising. One to three people in the initial wave of one million recipients are likely to die from side-effects of the vaccine, according to estimates by health experts, and dozens of others will contract life-threatening illnesses.

Vaccination is 'ending badger cull', claims the Badger Trust's Dominic Dyer

westerndailypress.co.uk

June 27, 2014

The roll-out of Government-backed badger vaccination programmes to tackle the spread of bovine tuberculosis spells the beginning of the end of badger culling a leading opponent has claimed.

Dominic Dyer, chief executive of the Badger Trust, made the statement after what he described as a: "ground-breaking" meeting on Tuesday in which Farming Minister George Eustice met a wide range of wildlife and farming groups.

Vaccination is not immunity

communities.washingtontimes.com

by Peter Lind

April 30, 2013

The seat of immunity is the gut and the nervous system response to a foreign invader.

Immunity is enhancing the immune system. The seat of immunity is primarily found in the gastrointestinal system. Mast cells are the major sensory input of the innate immune system. These cells are on the lookout for foreign invaders. Also, they help regulate acute inflammation from the beginning to end. Once the mast cell detects a pathogen or foreign intruder, it releases special chemicals, cytokines, that attack the intruders and then circulate in the body to recruit other cells of the immune system. This overarching regulatory control over innate immune processes has made mast cells successful targets to purposefully enhance or, alternatively, suppress mast cell responses in multiple therapeutic contexts. J Immunol. 2013 May 1;190(9):4458-63. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203420.

Vaccination is not immunization

24medica.com

by Robert Smith

May 16, 2012

There is only one kind of immunity and that is natural immunity which is achieved by battling the infectious diseases itself. Vaccination is merely the artificial triggering of temporary responses to manmade pathogens.

Vaccines are both harmful and dangerous and are leading to generations of humans with no natural defenses to disease. Vaccines do not provide long-term immunity; only temporary at best. Vaccines should never be called immunizations because that is a misnomer. Immunity and vaccinations are two different subjects altogether.

Vaccination Myths

relfe.com

by Alan Phillips

January 18, 2013

When my son began his routine vaccination series at age 2 months, I did not know there were any risks associated with immunizations.

But the clinic's literature contained a contradiction: the chances of a serious adverse reaction to the DPT vaccine were 1 in 1750, while his chances of dying from pertussis each year were 1 in several million. When I pointed this out to the physician, he angrily disagreed, and stormed out of the room mumbling, "I guess I should read that sometime..." Soon thereafter I learned of a child who had been permanently disabled by a vaccine, so I decided to investigate for myself. My findings have so alarmed me that I feel compelled to share them; hence, this report.

Vaccinations: 'That's my decision to make'

kpic.com

by Dee Dee Gatton

June 25, 2013

Oregon lawmakers approved a vaccine education bill, which would make it harder for parents to send their kids to school without vaccines. But not everyone is happy about it.

Darci Ritter has two kids, and she says she opposes the vaccinations. "I wouldn't want to put any poisons or toxins into my small children," Ritter said. She says her five year old daughter had vaccinations, the youngest did not. "My daughter that has no vaccinations, not one, is far healthier," she said. Ritter isn't the only parent who is against the shots. Oregon has the highest rate of parents refusing vaccinations for kindergartners.

Vaccine Court Tacitly Admits Vaccines Cause Autism

Personal Liberty Alerts

by Bob Livingston

January 29, 2013

Without admitting it, the United States "vaccine court" has admitted that vaccines cause autism.

The Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (aka, the absolve Big Pharma of liability at your expense program) has awarded millions of dollars to two children with autism-related disorders. It's a tacit admission that the vaccines administered to them caused their symptoms, which the court determined fell within the bounds of autism spectrum disorder. One child suffered a "severe and debilitating injury to his brain" following a round of vaccinations from 2003 to 2005. The vaccine linked specifically to the injury was the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, the court ruled.

Vaccine Dictators Lose Stranglehold Over Parental Rights

therefusers.com

January 23, 2013

A new study says more parents are refusing to follow the CDC's draconian vaccine schedule - and the children of refuser parents have better health, as measured by lower emergency room visits and hospital admissions. This has medical authorities in a tizzy

What the study doesn't mention is the CDC vaccine schedule has tripled in the past few decades - and the increase in vaccine adverse reactions has created a generation of kids with neurological damage (as defined in the medical textbook definion of a vaccine adverse reaction). Parents are looking around at the carnage and voting with their feet against vaccine mandates. The authors of this study seem to think that everyone should follow every vaccine recommendation issued by the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Have you ever been to an ACIP meeting? I have. It was a total farce. Doctors with conflicts of interest up the wazoo voted unanimously for almost every proposal placed before them. They know their bread is buttered by drug companies who pay them to conduct vaccine studies and if they vote against any proposal their vaccine gravy train will go off the tracks.

Vaccine Exemptions: Do They Really Put Others at Risk?

greenmedinfo.com

by Alan Phillips, J.D.

March 15, 2012

Parents who exercise a vaccine exemption for their children are often ridiculed for putting their own children and others at risk.

However, legally and medically, unvaccinated children do not pose a significant health risk to themselves or anyone else. Alternative vaccine views support this assertion, but the reasoning in this article comes straight from mainstream vaccine beliefs, accepted medical practice and current law. First, from the legal perspective, forty-eight state legislatures, federal agencies (e.g., Department of Defense, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services), and all U.S. territories offer religious exemptions to immunizations. The state legislatures and federal agencies providing these exemptions are presumed to have considered whether or not the exercise of these exemptions would pose a significant health risk. They would not have enacted these exemption laws if their exercise would pose a significant health risk. Thus, there is a legal presumption that the exercise of a vaccine exemption does not pose a significant risk to anyone.

[First]  [Previous] |    71     72     73     74     75     76     77     78     79     80    | [Next]  [Last] of 84 page(s)